Polish priest KRYSZTOF CHARAMSA comes out as gay, is sacked by Vatican

The Vatican dismissed a priest from his post in a Holy See office on Saturday after he told a newspaper he was gay and urged the Catholic Church to change its stance on homosexuality.


Monsignor Krzystof Charamsa was removed from his position at the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, the Vatican’s doctrinal arm where he had worked since 2003, a statement said.


Charamsa, 43, and a Polish theologian, announced he was gay and had a partner in a long interview with Italy’s Corriere della Sera newspaper on Saturday.


He later held a news conference with his partner, a Spanish man, and gay activists at a Rome restaurant. They had planned a demonstration in front of the Vatican but changed the venue several hours before it was due to have started.


The Vatican said Charamsa’s dismissal had nothing to do with his comments on his personal situation, which it said « merit respect ».


But it said giving the interview and the planned demonstration was « grave and irresponsible » given their timing on the eve of a synod of bishops who will discuss family issues, including how to reach out to gays.


It said his actions would subject the synod, which Pope Francis is due to open on Sunday, to « undue media pressure ».


The issue of homosexuality and the Church has dominated the aftermath of the pope’s visit to the United States last week.


In Saturday’s interview, Charamsa said his partner had helped him come to terms with his sexuality and knew he would have to give up the priesthood, although the Vatican statement made no reference to this outcome.


« It’s time for the Church to open its eyes about gay Catholics and to understand that the solution it proposes to them – total abstinence from a life of love – is inhuman, » he was quoted as saying.


The Catholic Church teaches that homosexuality is not a sin but that homosexual acts are.


The Vatican has been embarrassed by controversy over the pope’s meeting with Kim Davis, a Kentucky county clerk who went to jail in September for refusing to honour a U.S. Supreme Court ruling and issue same-sex marriage licences.


The Vatican said on Friday that « the only real audience » the pope had during his visit to Washington was with a small group that included a gay couple.



Reuters
The Independent


***


La névrose chrétienne (1976) par le Docteur PIERRE SOLIGNAC (May 25, 2012)
Le pape dit ne pas juger les homosexuels dans l’Église (July 29, 2013)
Il voulait guérir les gays, il présente ses excuses (July 3, 2013)
Church where toddler’s anti-gay song was filmed: We don’t condone hate (June 7, 2012)

Why Humans run the World

History professor YUVAL NOAH HARARI — author of Sapiens: A Brief History of Mankind — explains why humans have dominated Earth.


70,000 years ago humans were insignificant animals. The most important thing to know about prehistoric humans is that they were unimportant. Their impact on the world was very small, less than that of jellyfish, woodpeckers or bumblebees.


Today, however, humans control this planet. How did we reach from there to here? What was our secret of success, that turned us from insignificant apes minding their own business in a corner of Africa, into the rulers of the world?


We often look for the difference between us and other animals on the individual level. We want to believe that there is something special about the human body or human brain that makes each individual human vastly superior to a dog, or a pig, or a chimpanzee. But the fact is that one-on-one, humans are embarrassingly similar to chimpanzees. If you place me and a chimpanzee together on a lone island, to see who survives better, I would definitely place my bets on the chimp.


The real difference between us and other animals is on the collective level. Humans control the world because we are the only animal that can cooperate flexibly in large numbers. Ants and bees can also work together in large numbers, but they do so in a very rigid way. If a beehive is facing a new threat or a new opportunity, the bees cannot reinvent their social system overnight in order to cope better. They cannot, for example, execute the queen and establish a republic. Wolves and chimpanzees cooperate far more flexibly than ants, but they can do so only with small numbers of intimately known individuals. Among wolves and chimps, cooperation is based on personal acquaintance. If I am a chimp and I want to cooperate with you, I must know you personally: What kind of chimp are you? Are you a nice chimp? Are you an evil chimp? How can I cooperate with you if I don’t know you?


Only Homo sapiens can cooperate in extremely flexible ways with countless numbers of strangers. One-on-one or ten-on-ten, chimpanzees may be better than us. But pit 1,000 Sapiens against 1,000 chimps, and the Sapiens will win easily, for the simple reason that 1,000 chimps can never cooperate effectively. Put 100,000 chimps in Wall Street or Yankee Stadium, and you’ll get chaos. Put 100,000 humans there, and you’ll get trade networks and sports contests.


Cooperation is not always nice, of course. All the terrible things humans have been doing throughout history are also the product of mass cooperation. Prisons, slaughterhouses and concentration camps are also systems of mass cooperation. Chimpanzees don’t have prisons, slaughterhouses or concentration camps.


Yet how come humans alone of all the animals are capable of cooperating flexibly in large numbers, be it in order to play, to trade or to slaughter? The answer is our imagination. We can cooperate with numerous strangers because we can invent fictional stories, spread them around, and convince millions of strangers to believe in them. As long as everybody believes in the same fictions, we all obey the same laws, and can thereby cooperate effectively.


This is something only humans can do. You can never convince a chimpanzee to give you a banana by promising that after he dies, he will go to Chimpanzee Heaven and there receive countless bananas for his good deeds. No chimp will ever believe such a story. Only humans believe such stories. This is why we rule the world, whereas chimps are locked up in zoos and research laboratories.


It is relatively easy to accept that religious networks of cooperation are based on fictional stories. People build a cathedral together or go on crusade together because they believe the same stories about God and Heaven. But the same is true of all other types of large-scale human cooperation. Take for example our legal systems. Today, most legal systems are based on a belief in human rights. But human rights are a fiction, just like God and Heaven. In reality, humans have no rights, just as chimps or wolves have no rights. Cut open a human, and you won’t find there any rights. The only place where human rights exist is in the stories we invent and tell one another. Human rights may be a very attractive story, but it is only a story.


The same mechanism is at work in politics. Like gods and human rights, nations are fictions. A mountain is something real. You can see it, touch it, smell it. But the United States or Israel are not a physical reality. You cannot see them, touch them or smell them. They are just stories that humans invented and then became extremely attached to.


It is the same with economic networks of cooperation. Take a dollar bill, for example. It has no value in itself. You cannot eat it, drink it or wear it. But now come along some master storytellers like the Chair of the Federal Reserve and the President of the United States, and convince us to believe that this green piece of paper is worth five bananas. As long as millions of people believe this story, that green piece of paper really is worth five bananas. I can now go to the supermarket, hand a worthless piece of paper to a complete stranger whom I have never met before, and get real bananas in return. Try doing that with a chimpanzee.


Indeed, money is probably the most successful fiction ever invented by humans. Not all people believe in God, or in human rights, or in the United States of America. But everybody believes in money, and everybody believes in the dollar bill. Even Osama bin Laden. He hated American religion, American politics and American culture — but he was quite fond of American dollars. He had no objection to that story.


To conclude, whereas all other animals live in an objective world of rivers, trees and lions, we humans live in dual world. Yes, there are rivers, trees and lions in our world. But on top of that objective reality, we have constructed a second layer of make-believe reality, comprising fictional entities such as the European Union, God, the dollar and human rights.


And as time passes, these fictional entities have become ever more powerful, so that today they are the most powerful forces in the world. The very survival of trees, rivers and animals now depends on the wishes and decisions of fictional entities such as the United States and the World Bank — entities that exist only in our own imagination.



Yuval Noah Harari
ideas.ted.com


***


The Trap: What Happened to Our Dream of Freedom (2007) produit par ADAM CURTIS
(December 9, 2011)
In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni (1978) de GUY DEBORD (October 22, 2011)
The Century Of Self (2002) by ADAM CURTIS (December 23, 2010)

Le pape crée une instance pour juger les évêques couvrant des abus sexuels

Un prêtre pédophile sur 50, ce n'est pas «énorme», mais un prêtre pédophile, «c'est déjà trop», a lancé l'ancien cardinal Jean-Claude Turcotte

Cité du Vatican — Le pape a donné son feu vert mercredi à la création au Vatican d’une instance judiciaire chargée de juger les évêques dans le cas où ils auraient couvert des abus sexuels commis par des prêtres dans leur diocèse.


Les évêques pourront être jugés pour «manquement à leur devoir professionnel» par cette «nouvelle instance judiciaire à l’intérieur de la Congrégation pour la doctrine de la foi». Les associations d’anciennes victimes de prêtres pédophiles réclamaient depuis longtemps que le fait pour un évêque d’avoir couvert les abus sur mineurs par des prêtres de son diocèse soit un délit reconnu et puni par le Vatican.



Agence France-Presse
Le Devoir


***


Les propos du pape sur la pédophilie ont des échos jusqu’au Québec (July 15, 2014)
Des victimes de prêtres veulent Mgr Ouellet comme pape (March 11, 2013)
Pornographie juvénile : un prêtre de Sorel-Tracy accusé (March 8, 2013)
Congrégations générales – Les problèmes de l’Église sur la table (March 7, 2013)
Agressions sexuelles: un deuxième frère de Sainte-Croix sera arrêté (December 29, 2012)
Symposium sur la pédophilie – Le pape appelle au «renouveau de l’Église» (February 15, 2012)
Pornographie juvénile – Sitôt condamné, l’ex-évêque Lahey est libéré (January 5, 2012)
Église néerlandaise: des «dizaines de milliers» de mineurs abusés sexuellement (December 16, 2011)
Pédophilie – L’Église veut éduquer son clergé par Internet (June 28, 2011)
Former Catholic bishop Raymond Lahey pleads guilty to child pornography charges (May 4, 2011)
Pédophilie – Le Vatican va envoyer une «circulaire» aux évêques (November 20, 2010)
Le Vatican durcit les règles contre la pédophilie (July 15, 2010)
Top Catholic Priest Accused of Sexually Abusing His Own Sons (June 25, 2010)
Pope addresses priest abuse scandal (June 11, 2010)
Vatican Sex Abuse Prosecutor: Guilty Priests Are Going To Hell (June 4, 2010)
Priest Accused Of Abusing Boy, Turning Home Into ‘Erotic Dungeon’ Surrenders To Police
(May 26, 2010)
Le Vatican publiera un guide contre la pédophilie (April 9, 2010)
Agressions sexuelles par des membres du clergé – Les victimes exigent la démission de Mgr Ouellet (February 17, 2010)

Philippe Couillard «ému» par sa courte rencontre avec le pape

Cité du Vatican – Un premier ministre Philippe Couillard ému a accueilli avec étonnement une requête empreinte d’humilité du pape François, mercredi matin: «Je vous demande de prier pour moi».


«Cela m’a vraiment surpris et ému. Penser que le pape me demande de prier pour lui, j’ai trouvé ça surprenant et émouvant à la fois», dira M. Couillard, quelques instants après un bref entretien d’une minute à peine avec le souverain pontife.


Sous un soleil de plomb, pendant plus de deux heures, le premier ministre Couillard avait patiemment attendu, avec sa conjointe Suzanne Pilote, pendant l’homélie du pape sur le mariage, en italien d’abord, reprise ensuite en français, en espagnol, mais aussi en russe et en arabe. La Place Saint-Pierre était bondée; plus de 50 000 fidèles s’étaient déplacés pour cet événement hebdomadaire. Le couple de Québécois se trouvait, avec un dignitaire ukrainien, aux premières loges, devant l’espace clôturé réservé aux personnalités où se trouvait le maire de Montréal, Denis Coderre, il y a quelques semaines.


En point de presse par la suite, M. Couillard souligna ne pas être d’accord avec l’affirmation que la religion était en perte de vitesse au Québec. On se rappellera de «l’enthousiasme» autour de la visite de Jean-Paul II en 1984, observe-t-il. Aussi l’arrivée du pape François est de nature à rapprocher les gens, «il est aimé à travers le monde. L’image de simplicité qu’il dégage, les gens y sont très sensibles».


Le rapport des Québécois avec la religion a changé, mais «j’ai constaté que c’est encore très important pour beaucoup plus de gens qu’on pense». «À L’Isle-Verte, à Mégantic, où sont allés les gens quand le malheur a frappé ? À l’église ! ». Il rappelle qu’il était en faveur du maintien du crucifix à l’Assemblée nationale, convaincu que la population est en accord avec la préservation de ce patrimoine religieux.


M. Couillard avait apporté des présents représentants sa région: un bâton de pèlerin fait par un artisan du Lac-Saint-Jean, des produits des moines trappistes de Dolbeau et ceux d’un verger de la région.


Dans une lettre transmise de main à main, M. Couillard a réitéré l’invitation faite ce printemps par Denis Coderre pour souligner les fêtes du 375e anniversaire de Montréal. Le moment n’était pas approprié à une réponse immédiate, mais il a reçu l’invitation avec un sourire, de relever M. Couillard. Le premier ministre Stephen Harper sera aussi à Rome le mois prochain et aura l’occasion de lui rappeler aussi qu’il serait le bienvenu. Le pape est «très sensible à la question québécoise», il est proche des cardinaux Cyprien Lacroix et Marc Ouellet.


Il est difficile de prévoir les probabilités de cette visite, «c’est 50-50, c’est difficile d’apprécier, on verra avec le temps», de résumer M. Couillard.


En fin de journée, M. Couillard devait prononcer un discours pour souligner le 50e anniversaire de la présence du Québec en Italie. Une représentation avait été ouverte à Milan en 1965.



Denis Lessard
La Presse

Solar eclipse will be the beginning of the end of the world, say Christian pastors

Solar Eclipse

This is the way the world ends; not with a bang but an eclipse. Or so some Christian ministers have said.


Many on the internet are worried that Friday’s solar eclipse is a sign of the end times, or a message of judgement from God. And while the theories are largely speculative, they are encouraged by a genuine collision of three rare and significant celestial events on Friday.


As well as the eclipse itself, a Supermoon and the Spring equinox are also set to happen — all three of which have in the past been celebrated as events of significance within various cultures around the world.


As well as the rare and spectacular sights in the sky, those who advocate the theory that the eclipse and other events are a sign of the end times or an omen of something else say that recent ominous events also show that something could happen.


The kinds of geo-political and societal events that tend to be associated with the end times by those who believe in such events are also happening, encouraging the idea that Friday could mark a sign of the apocalypse or another catastrophic event. Global stock markets are volatile and at record highs; there is increasing tension in the Middle East, including in Israel; and votes on same-sex marriage are scheduled for this summer in the US.


WorldNetDaily, an American site that is roughly affiliated with the American political right, reported that biblical experts believe that the message is a sign of judgment from God to those on Earth.


The co-founder of Christian website Root Source, Bob O’Dell, told WND that the message was a sign of judgment. The eclipse will be total across the North Pole, and so is not pointed at anyone in particular.


“The North Pole can’t really be called the territory of any particular nation or people,” O’Dell told the site. “This is likely a message from God to the entire world.”


But since the eclipse will most affect those in northern Europe, the message should be especially heeded by people there, according to a pastor interviewed by WND.


“In Jewish tradition, a total solar eclipse is a warning to the Gentiles and a sign of judgment on the nations,” he told the paper. “When we look at where the darkness will be, it will be in northern European countries like England and Sweden where we see the rise of Islam and anti-Israel sentiment. Europeans especially should take heed.”


The connection between Friday’s eclipse and the end of the world comes partly from the “Blood Moon Prophecy”. That refers to the theory that a tetrad — four consecutive lunar eclipses, with six full moons between them — is a sign that the world is coming to an end.


Those that believe in the prophecy see it partly borne out by the Book of Joel, which says that “the sun will turn into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and terrible day of the Lord comes”. That has been connected to the phenomenon of the blood moon — the phenomenon where the moon turns copper red as it passes under the Earth’s shadow.


March’s solar eclipse have been connected by some to the series of lunar ones that are seen as harbingers of the end times. This solar eclipse sits in the middle of the tetrad, and is seen as another signal that signs are appearing in the sky.


There is no way to be sure that the predictions won’t come true until Friday morning, when the eclipse happens — it is set to begin around 8am and carry on until about 11am. But something spectacular is certain to happen, as the moon moves in front of the sun and brings darkness to the UK, whether or not it also marks the end of the world.



Andrew Griffin
The Independent


***


Blood moon returns: Another total lunar eclipse will color the moon blood red (October 7, 2014)
Welcome back Jesus? Christians say ‘Blood Moon’ signals End Times (April 15, 2014)